A Neat legal services
law costing and legal services call us now on 01228 672 220
  
*

legal services
Free Hints and Tips NewsletterLEARN THE SECRETS of why some fee earners generate more costs than others ...
CLICK HERE for our series of Free Costs Hints and Tips >>

A Neat Legal Services,
Unit I, Baron Way
Kingmoor Business Park
Carlisle CA6 4SJ

DX 63043 Carlisle

Tel : 01228 672 220
Fax : 01228 672 221
Email


Important Amendments to Practice Directions

Useful Articles > Important Amendments to Practice Directions (print this page )

The 50th version of the Civil Proceedure Rules came into force on 1st October and they contain a couple of important amendments that I thought it would be helpful to point out. 

Firstly Section 19.4 of the Practice Direction supplementing Parts 43 to 48 has been amended to increase the information that a party has to provide to the other side when a funding arrangement includes an insurance policy. 

The new practice direction requires the level of cover provided by the insurance to be given and, where premiums are staged, the points at which the increased premium is payable. 

There is a new form N251 which provides for these changes.  Section 19.6 of the PD states that the amendments do not apply where the funding arrangement was entered into before 1st October 2009. 

Another important change to providing information about funding arrangements is contained in Practice Direction - Pre-Action Conduct.  Section 9.3 now states that a party MUST inform the other parties about a funding arrangement as soon as possible

"....and in any event either within 7 days of entering into the funding arrangement concerned or, where a claimant enters into a funding arrangement before sending a letter before claim, in the letter before claim."

The use of the word "must" as opposed to the word "should" is significant as the previous cases on giving information about funding arrangements pre-issue which were decided in the receiving party's favour were on the basis that "should" in the PDP being considered means "ought to" which is not the same as "has" or "must".

This amendment I think will mean that those authorities ( Metcalfe v Clipston and Cullen v Chopra ) will not apply from now on.

Andrew

A Neat Legal Services
Law Costs Draftsmen and Legal Costs Consultants.



end delays in costs recovery with our instant costs payments

free collection and delivery of files
useful legal articles